It will be recalled that President Jonathan
had formally asked the National Assembly to amend the 2013 Appropriation Act
and pointedly told the lawmakers that they went beyond their brief by inserting
a clause in the appropriation act allocating zero budget for the commission
over the President’s refusal to sack her.
The House had called for Oteh’s sack
through its resolution on near collapse of capital market, the decision that
was ignored by the presidency.
The Clause 10 inserted in the 2013
Appropriation Act reads; “All revenue, however, described including all fees
received, fines, grants, budgetary provisions and all internally and externally
generated revenue shall not be spent by the Security and Exchange Commission
for recurrent or Capital purposes or for any other matters, nor liabilities
thereon incurred except with prior appropriation and approval by the National
Assembly.”
However, President Jonathan had raised
reservation on the clause saying, “Considering the fact that the budget of the
Securities and Exchange Commission does not form part of the core 2013 Federal
Budget as presented to the National Assembly, I believe that this clause ought
not to have been inserted in the 2013 Appropriation Act in the first place.
Secondly, the import of the clause is tantamount to shutting down the business
of the Commission with a potential negative impact on the capital market.”
Ostensibly reacting to the President’s
comment over National Assembly resolve that Oteh must go at all cost, the House
through another motion on Oteh’s removal, moved by House Deputy Minority Whip
Honourable Garba Datti it insisted that the presidency must act on its
resolution and mandated its Committee on Legislative Compliance to monitor the
compliance and report back within 21 days.
The lawmaker had, while moving his motion,
said that “the inaction of the President was an extension of blatant disregard
of the resolutions of the House of Representatives, and that most of these
resolutions, though products of motions, hinge on fundamental public duty
placed on public officers by the Constitution under the Fundamental
Objectives and Directive principles of State Policy”.
According to him, “rhe motion urging the
removal of Ms Arunma Oteh, for instance, hinged on the fact that her
appointment as Director -Gerneral of the Securities Exchange Commission was a
gross violation of the Commission’s Act as she does not possess the minimum
professional qualification prescribed for appointment to that position”.
Continuing, he said, “recently, the
Executive has adopted the dangerous and vexatious approach of picking and choosing
the implementation of resolutions of the Senate on the dismissal of
Abdulrasheed Maina which was passed much later in time while still disregarding
the long pending motion on the removal of the Director General of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Resolutions bordering on the breach of
extant legislations should not be treated with levity as such tends to portray
government in bad light”, he noted.
Other lawmakers who supported the motion
include, Minority Leader of the House, Mr Femi Gbajabiamila, Honourable
Suleiman Aminu, Friday Itulah, Tajudeen Yusuf and Ibrahim El-Sudi.
When the motion was put to vote by the
Speaker, Honourable Aminu Tambuwal who presided over the session it was
unanimously supported.
Source: National Mirror
No comments:
Post a Comment