There
are strong indications that the National Judicial Council (NJC),may ask the
suspended President of the Court of Appeal (PCA),Justice Ayo Isa Salami,to
proceed on terminal leave in July.
The development, according to a highly-placed source, is without
prejudice to the suspended PCA’s pending suit,before a Federal High court
sitting in Abuja.
By virtue of public service rule, which also applies to the
judicial service, a public office holder, must proceed on pre-retirement leave
three months to their date of retirement.
Sunday Mirror’s investigation from the NJC showed that the
embattled PCA will be due for retirement in October, when he would have clocked
the mandatory retirement age of 70 years.
According to the dependable source,”Justice Salami will be 70 in
October, by the grace of God,and since he is only on suspension,there is the
likelihood that the NJC,his employer,will ask him to begin his pre-retirement
leave in July,since his retirement is in October.”
When reminded of Salami’s matter pending before the court, the
source said, “What I have told you is not to preempt whatever decision the
court will arrive at, it is purely from the administrative point of view.”
Justice Salami, who has been on suspension since August 18, 2011
over an offence bordering on “gross misconduct”, is challenging the action of
the then Justice Aloysius Katsina- Alu-led NJC. Unfortunately, his matter,
which had dragged over a year, was dealt a fatal blow, as it was listed for
mention, and was so mentioned at the last adjourned date. Clearly, the matter began
de novo (afresh),at the last adjourned date.
The need for the matter to begin de novo, arose from the
transfer of the trial judge,Justice Donatus Okorowo,to the Taraba Division of
the federal high court.
Consequent upon the development the new judge, Justice S.
Chukwu, said the court was constrained to re-list the suit, since there was no
“assignment order” from the Chief Judge (CJ) of the Federal High Court, Justice
Ibrahim Auta, directing him (Justice Chukwu), to hear the suit.
Besides, it was further observed that there was neither an
application from Justice Okorowo, nor a fiat (from the CJ), directing the new
judge to continue hearing in the matter. Hence, the suit could safely be said
to be precariously hanging in the balance.
Or.what is the possibility that a suit that was adjourned to May
30,for parties to address the court on whether it has the jurisdiction to hear
the matter or even to state it, in view of the fact that there is no assignment
order from the CJ for the hearing of the pending matter.
Source: National Mirror
No comments:
Post a Comment